Daily Oral Edaravone for ALS No Better Than On/Off Regimen

You May Be Interested In:Digital transformation’s big payoff


SAVANNAH, Ga. — Daily oral edaravone (Radicava ORS) was not superior to the FDA-approved on/off regimen in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a phase IIIb trial showed.

Both on/off dosing and daily oral edaravone led to similar scores (P=0.777) on the Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) at week 48, reported Jeffrey Rothstein, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and co-authors at the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) annual meeting.

The CAFS ranks patients’ clinical outcomes based on changes in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores and time to death. Both dosing regimens provided comparable changes in ALSFRS-R scores from baseline to week 48, Rothstein and colleagues said.

“There was no superiority demonstrated when comparing the daily dosing regimen versus the approved on/off dosing regimen for any key or other secondary efficacy endpoints from baseline to week 48, including no significant difference between groups when measuring time to death, tracheostomy, or permanent assisted mechanical ventilation,” they noted.

The trial was terminated in 2023 based on a pre-planned futility analysis that indicated a low probability of daily treatment being superior.

“The study confirmed that daily dosing showed no significant difference in efficacy, reinforcing the suitability of the current FDA-approved regimen,” said Gustavo Suarez Zambrano, MD, of edaravone maker Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America.

“Importantly, no new safety concerns were identified, further validating oral edaravone’s safety profile,” Zambrano told MedPage Today.

Oral edaravone was approved in 2022 based on bioequivalence and long-term safety studies comparing it with the IV edaravone formulation, which was approved for ALS in 2017. The drug is designed to offset oxidative stress, which is implicated in ALS.

The phase IIIb MT-1186-A02 trial evaluated whether daily dosing offered superior benefits in ALS compared with the FDA-approved on/off regimen over 48 weeks in 383 ALS patients. The study was a postmarketing commitment after IV edaravone was approved.

The recommended dosage of oral edaravone is 105 mg (5 mL) taken orally or by feeding tube after overnight fasting. In this study, half of participants received the approved on/off regimen which is administered in 28-day cycles: treatment for 14 days followed by placebo for 14 days in cycle 1, then treatment for 10 days followed by placebo for 18 days for the remaining cycles. The once-daily group received 105 mg each day throughout the study.

Trial participants had definite or probable ALS according to El Escorial revised criteria and a baseline forced vital capacity of at least 70%. Their first ALS symptom had occurred within the past 2 years.

Mean baseline age was about 59 and 64% were men. More than a third (37.3%) were from the Asia Pacific region, 33.9% were from North America, and 28.7% were from Europe. The mean disease duration from onset of symptoms to screening was 1.2 years.

In total, 246 patients completed the 48-week double-blind treatment period. The most common reason for stopping treatment was the study’s early termination, followed by patients withdrawing consent.

Most participants — 85.9% in the once-daily group and 93.2% in the on/off group — reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Falls, COVID-19, dysphagia, and constipation were reported in both groups.

Serious TEAEs emerged in 27.1% of the once-daily group and 28.8% of the on/off group, most commonly dysphagia. TEAEs related to the study drug were reported in 24.5% of the once-daily group and 16.8% of the on/off group, most frequently headache.

“Overall, no significant differences in the incidence of TEAEs between groups were observed,” Rothstein and colleagues noted. “There were no significant safety findings observed; no new safety signal was identified.”

The ALSFRS-R changes observed at week 48 in this trial were similar to ones seen in previous studies of IV edaravone, the researchers added.

  • Judy George covers neurology and neuroscience news for MedPage Today, writing about brain aging, Alzheimer’s, dementia, MS, rare diseases, epilepsy, autism, headache, stroke, Parkinson’s, ALS, concussion, CTE, sleep, pain, and more. Follow

Disclosures

This study was sponsored by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America.

Rothstein reported relationships Expansion Therapeutics, National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, F Prime, and the ALS Association.

Zambrano is employed by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America.

Primary Source

American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Source Reference: Rothstein J “Phase 3b study MT-1186-A02 to investigate the superiority of daily dosing vs the FDA-approved on/off regimen of oral edaravone (Radicava ORS) in patients with ALS” AANEM; Abstract 138.



share Paylaş facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Allergy medications: Know your options
Fingernail do’s and don’ts
A photo of a hospital interior.
Indiana Hospitals Pull Merger Application After Pushback Over Monopoly Concerns – KFF Health News
Packages of frozen pizza stacked in a supermarket freezer section.
Ultraprocessed Foods Implicated in Psoriasis Activity
Fjolla Arifi
We Asked Experts What You Should Do If You Overdose On Weed
Two women smile at the camera while holding a baby with a white bow on her head
After Congress Ended Extra Cash Aid for Families, Communities Tackle Child Poverty Alone – KFF Health News
Cyberattack roundup: Ransomware hits Georgia hospital and Colorado pathology services
Cyberattack roundup: Ransomware hits Georgia hospital and Colorado pathology services
Frontline Reports | © 2024 | News